image/svg+xml Both High-resolution and atlas SC maps are impacted by smoothing. - Stronger & wider smoothing increases reliability. - Moderate smoothing improves identifiability (2mm FWHM) - Extensive smoothing reduces individual identifiability (>6mm FWHM) - Deterministic SC performed better at identification - Probabilistic SC was comparatively more reliable Concluding remarks: - Smoothing is crucial for high-resolution SC (2-6 mm FWHM recommended) - Smoothing can benefit atlas-resolution SC (4-8 mm FWHM recommended) - Deterministic SC requires stronger smoothing compared to probabilistic Diffusion images sourced from the Human Connectome Project: - 42 individuals with repeat scans - Deterministic & probabilistic tractography Different smoothing parameters compared based on: - Raliability (robustness) - Identifiability (individualised) Other important considerations: - Computation & storage burden HRSC mapped at the resolution of cortical vertices Connectivity-based spatial smoothing performed - truncated bivariate Gaussian kernel All SC maps also downsampled to atlas resolution Spatial smoothing is a well-recognized preprocessing step that is commonly implemented in a wide range of neuroimaging modalities (fMRI, EEG, fNIRS, PET, etc.). This step is undertaken to increase the signal to noise ratio at the expense of spatial specificity [1]. Structural connectivity (SC) is not normally smoothed because most SC maps are constructed at the resolution of brain atlases comprising broad areal parcels. Recent studies highlight the benefits of investigating SC higher spatial resolutions: - High-resolution SC (HRSC) accurately captures intricate neural connections [2] - HRSC detects local modularities in brain networks [3] - HRCS perform better in neural fingerprinting and predicting behavior [4] High-resolution connectomes are susceptible to: - image registration misalignment, tractography artifacts and noise This can reduce connectome accuracy and test-retest reliability. We investigate a network analogue of image smoothing to address these key challenges and investigate the impacts of smoothing on connectome reliability and individual identifiability of SC maps at different resolutions. a. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Australiab. Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne, Australiac. Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia Challenges and impacts of spatial smoothing on high-resolution structural connectomes Sina Mansour L. a, Caio Seguin b, Vanessa Cropley b, Robert E. Smith c, Andrew Zalesky a,b Study design Introduction Results 42 individuals Two scans Diffusion MRI Probabilistic & deterministictractography A B High-resolutionconnectome Brain atlasconnectome Smoothedhigh-resolution SC Smoothedbrain atlas SC Differentsmoothingparameters All individuals& scans All individuals& scans All individuals, scans, & smoothing parameters All individuals, scans, & smoothing parameters Similarity matrix(connectivity correlation) All smoothingparameters Intra-individual similarities Inter-individual similarities C Reliability: Uniformity: Identifiability: 1 test retest 1 2 1 Smoothing impact on high-resolution connectomes Smoothing impact on atlas-based connectomes (FWHM) 2mm 3mm 0.1 1mm 4mm 6mm 8mm 10mm 0.01 0.001 1. Mikl, Michal, et al. "Effects of spatial smoothing on fMRI group inferences." Magnetic resonance imaging 26.4 (2008): 490-503. 2. Besson, Pierre, et al. "Whole-brain high-resolution structural connectome: inter-subject validation and application to the anatomical segmentation of the striatum." Brain topography 30.3 (2017): 291-302. 3. Taylor, Peter N., Yujiang Wang, and Marcus Kaiser. "Within brain area tractography suggests local modularity using high resolution connectomics." Scientific reports 7.1 (2017): 1-9.4. Mansour L., Sina, et al. "High-resolution connectomic fingerprints: Mapping neural identity and behavior." NeuroImage 229 (2021): 117695. [Mikl et al. 2008]
1
  1. Poster preview
  2. Intro - Spatial smoothing
  3. Intro - High-resolution structural connectivity
  4. Intro - atlas resolution
  5. Intro - Vertex resolution
  6. Intro - High-resolution structural connectivity
  7. Method - Dataset
  8. Method - Smoothing pipiline
  9. Method - HRSC mapping
  10. Method - Smoothing formulation
  11. Method - High resolution connectivity smoothing
  12. Method - Atlas downsampling
  13. Method - Smoothing evaluation
  14. Method - Reliability
  15. Method - Uniformity
  16. Method - Identifiability
  17. Results - Smoothing kernels
  18. Results - Comparisons
  19. Conclusions
  20. Final page